Gays, Paedophiles and others

Do you consider gays as:

1. People who engaged in sinful practices and perversions and they must repent of their sin;
2. People who are sick, like AIDS or leprosy, who needs treatment, but we should not discriminate against them;
3. Normal people, but are discriminated against because of some differences, much like the Rohingyas or Dalits (or even left-handed).

Then what do you think of the paedophiles. Are they 1, 2 or 3?
What about adulterers and fornicators?
What about those who engaged in other sexual perversions, such as fetish sadism and masochism?
What about beasitility?

I consider those who opt for option 3 as pro-gays. A pro-gay person need not be a homosexual. He or she just have to consider homosexual acts as a normal activity.

So for those who think that gay is option 3, do you think that paedophiles is also option 3? Paedophiles are the bad guys in the world of sexual perversion. Those who engaged in it are named and shamed. Even sinners and perverts want to feel righteous. They must have a bad guy to reflect their righteousness. And paedophiles have victims. These victims are usually young children. But what if it is consensual? Would you think that consensual paedophiles are also normal (option 3), just like the gays? Or is your inclusion not inclusive enough to accept those who prefer sex partners of certain age, but can accept sex partner that prefer the same sex? Can you accept people who prefer non-human sex partners? Are they also normal, if the animal is a mammal?